![]() ![]() I'm curious why the sofware architecture prohibits edditing large amounts of RAW files. You all have an opinion on this, right? :o) Thanks to all who already voted! It was great if all the +140 other people who already watched that Poll cast their vote as well. ![]() ![]() It meant having to have the respective editing app open to browse suitable assets! Even having clones of that browsing module sitting in all three Affintity apps would be very unelegant, programmatically. Having a browsing Persona inside Photo/Designer/Publisher as suggested here is frankly what I considered a very poor solution. But those who need RAW files could use that same tool also for editing large amounts of RAWs in ways which are utterly impossible with Affinity Photo, due to its software architecture. From here you could send the file directly to Affinity Photo / Designer / Publisher. There's other DAM however, which work pretty much like Bridge or XNView and let you quickly browse whatever files you have on disk. Thanks for your vote and opinion comparison with Lighroom as a catalog based program where you first have to import your files into a database is maybe not ideal: That importing process may get perceived as a needless complication indeed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |